Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACQQ vs DRKY: which paid, and which earned it?

ACQQ and DRKY both write options for income.

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and VistaShares Target 15 DRUKMacro Distribution ETF.

0.0%ACQQ cash paid, 1 year
14.1%DRKY cash paid, 1 year
−2.1%ACQQ total return, 1 year
+24.1%DRKY total return, 1 year
ACQQ0.8 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQ
DRKY9.7 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+14.4%DRKY+24.1%14.1% of it arrived as cash9.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+14.4%DRKY+24.1%14.1% cash9.7 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and DRKY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACQQOnly in DRKY
NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%Natera Inc 25.22%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 9.17%
STMicroelectronics NV 7.49%
YPF SA 4.78%
Insmed Inc 4.62%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 4.52%
Alphabet Inc 4.45%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACQQ and DRKY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACQQDRKYACQQDRKYACQQDRKY
3 monthsnot published+11.8%not published3.8%not published+9.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+25.1%not published8.1%not published+7.1 pts
Since launch−2.1%+24.1%0.0%14.1%−0.8 pts+9.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACQQ and DRKY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ
DRKY
VistaShares Target 15 DRUKMacro Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesVistaShares
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published14.8%
Expense ratio0.72%0.95%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)14.1% (since launch on Oct 8, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−2.1%+8.1%
Total return, 1 year−2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+24.1% (since launch on Oct 8, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.3%+14.4%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts+9.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days345 days
Net assets$23m$19m

ACQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

DRKY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 8, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, DRKY paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +14.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 9.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or DRKY?
ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and DRKY charges 0.95%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACQQ against DRKY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against DRKY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-drky Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources