Data as of .
ACQQ vs SPUT: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and SPUT both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and SPUT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACQQ | Only in SPUT |
|---|---|
| NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | TREASURY BILL 49.24% |
| NVIDIA Corp 3.85% | |
| Apple Inc 3.22% | |
| Microsoft Corp 2.47% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 2.09% | |
| Alphabet Inc 1.84% | |
| Broadcom Inc 1.60% | |
| Alphabet Inc 1.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACQQ | SPUT | ACQQ | SPUT | ACQQ | SPUT | |
| 3 months | not published | +2.4% | not published | 1.1% | not published | +0.1 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.5% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −6.5 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +11.5% | not published | 5.2% | not published | −5.1 pts |
| Since launch | −2.1% | +22.4% | 0.0% | 8.5% | −0.8 pts | −15.6 pts |
| ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ | SPUT Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Innovator |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 4.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.1% | +6.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +11.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.3% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.8 pts | −5.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 553 days |
| Net assets | $23m | $17m |
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.
SPUT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACQQ or SPUT?
- ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and SPUT charges 0.79%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against SPUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-sput Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.