Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTY vs SPUT: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against SPUT’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF.

30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
5.2%SPUT cash paid, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year
+11.5%SPUT total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SPUT scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTY 37SPUT 633.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ
SPUT5.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%SPUT+11.5%5.2% as cash5.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%SPUT+11.5%5.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTY and SPUT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTYOnly in SPUT
NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%TREASURY BILL 49.24%
XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%NVIDIA Corp 3.85%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53%Apple Inc 3.22%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%Microsoft Corp 2.47%
Amazon.com Inc 2.09%
Alphabet Inc 1.84%
Broadcom Inc 1.60%
Alphabet Inc 1.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTY and SPUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTYSPUTQDTYSPUTQDTYSPUT
3 months−0.9%+2.4%7.9%1.1%+1.6 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+20.7%+11.5%17.3%2.5%−3.6 pts−6.5 pts
1 year+20.2%+11.5%30.9%5.2%−1.6 pts−5.1 pts
Since launch+27.1%+22.4%42.0%8.5%−8.5 pts−15.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTY and SPUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
SPUT
Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxInnovator
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.9%4.7%
Expense ratio1.17%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year30.9%5.2%
Price change, 1 year−14.0%+6.0%
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+11.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−1.6 pts−5.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%not published
Age582 days553 days
Net assets$27m$17m

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

SPUT in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTY or SPUT?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and SPUT paid 5.2%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTY or SPUT?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTY returned +20.2% and SPUT returned +11.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTY or SPUT?
QDTY charges 1.17% a year and SPUT charges 0.79%, so SPUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTY against SPUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against SPUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-sput Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources