Data as of .
QDTY vs TPRY: which paid, and which earned it?
QDTY and TPRY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTY and TPRY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTY | Only in TPRY |
|---|---|
| NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19% | Micron Technology Inc 13.23% |
| XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21% | Amazon.com Inc 12.40% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 8.48% |
| United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07% | Alphabet Inc 6.91% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 5.35% | |
| Uber Technologies Inc 5.23% | |
| Apple Inc 4.91% | |
| Vistra Corp 4.57% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTY | TPRY | QDTY | TPRY | QDTY | TPRY | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | −5.9% | 7.9% | 3.5% | +1.6 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 6 months | +20.7% | +11.9% | 17.3% | 8.1% | −3.6 pts | −6.1 pts |
| 1 year | +20.2% | not published | 30.9% | not published | −1.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +27.1% | +2.1% | 42.0% | 7.4% | −8.5 pts | −9.3 pts |
| QDTY YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | VistaShares |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 25.9% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 1.17% | 0.95% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 30.9% | 7.4% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −14.0% | −5.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +2.1% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +11.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.6 pts | −9.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 94% | not published |
| Age | 582 days | 204 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $4m |
QDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
TPRY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPRY paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +11.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QDTY or TPRY?
- QDTY charges 1.17% a year and TPRY charges 0.95%, so TPRY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against TPRY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-tpry Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.