Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QRMI vs SPUT: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QRMI paid 11.8% of its price in cash against SPUT’s 5.2%, though SPUT returned more with it reinvested.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF and Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF.

11.8%QRMI cash paid, 1 year
5.2%SPUT cash paid, 1 year
+8.5%QRMI total return, 1 year
+11.5%SPUT total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SPUT scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QRMI 28.4SPUT 633.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QRMI13.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash13.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%13.3 pts behind QQQ
SPUT5.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%SPUT+11.5%5.2% as cash5.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%SPUT+11.5%5.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QRMI and SPUT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QRMI and SPUT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQRMISPUT
NVIDIA CORP8.49%3.85%
APPLE INC7.78%3.22%
MICROSOFT CORP5.81%2.47%
AMAZON.COM INC4.33%2.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL A3.25%1.84%
BROADCOM INC2.69%1.60%
ALPHABET INC-CL C3.01%1.59%
META PLATFORMS INC3.13%1.10%
TESLA INC3.03%0.91%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC5.02%0.48%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES4.00%0.47%
WALMART INC2.27%0.47%
Only in each
Only in QRMIOnly in SPUT
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.86%TREASURY BILL 49.24%
CASH 1.06%JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.70%
ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS 0.69%Eli Lilly & Co 0.65%
SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.68%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.54%
ARM HOLDINGS PLC-ADR 0.52%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.54%
NDX US 10/16/26 P28000 0.47%Visa Inc 0.46%
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.26%Johnson & Johnson 0.46%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 0.24%Caterpillar Inc 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QRMI and SPUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QRMISPUTQRMISPUTQRMISPUT
3 months+0.6%+2.4%3.0%1.1%+3.1 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+7.3%+11.5%6.1%2.5%−17.0 pts−6.5 pts
1 year+8.5%+11.5%11.8%5.2%−13.3 pts−5.1 pts
3 years+26.7%not published33.5%not published−71.5 ptsnot published
Since launch+10.4%+22.4%40.8%8.5%−89.1 pts−15.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QRMI and SPUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
SPUT
Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XInnovator
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.0%4.7%
Expense ratio0.60%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year11.8%5.2%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%+6.0%
Total return, 1 year+8.5%+11.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−13.3 pts−5.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age1849 days553 days
Net assets$15m$17m

QRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

SPUT in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QRMI or SPUT?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting price in cash and SPUT paid 5.2%, so QRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QRMI or SPUT?
With every distribution reinvested, QRMI returned +8.5% and SPUT returned +11.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SPUT returned more.
Which is cheaper, QRMI or SPUT?
QRMI charges 0.60% a year and SPUT charges 0.79%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QRMI against SPUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QRMI against SPUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qrmi-vs-sput Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources