Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDDD vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

DDDD and XQQI both write options for income.

YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

1.6%DDDD cash paid, 1 year
13.7%XQQI cash paid, 1 year
+8.7%DDDD total return, 1 year
+14.3%XQQI total return, 1 year
DDDD6.5 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+15.3%DDDD+8.7%6.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+15.3%DDDD+8.7%6.5 pts behind SPY
XQQI2.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% of it arrived as cash2.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% as cash2.9 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and XQQI hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DDDD and XQQI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDDDDXQQI
Texas Instruments Inc3.32%1.12%
Amgen Inc4.38%0.96%
QUALCOMM Inc2.73%0.85%
PepsiCo Inc3.50%0.83%
Automatic Data Processing Inc2.78%0.50%
Comcast Corp2.05%0.37%
Fastenal Co1.42%0.21%
Paychex Inc0.95%0.15%
Only in each
Only in DDDDOnly in XQQI
Merck & Co Inc 4.93%NVIDIA Corp 8.70%
Abbott Laboratories 4.53%Apple Inc 7.91%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.30%Microsoft Corp 5.94%
Chevron Corp 4.25%Micron Technology Inc 5.12%
ConocoPhillips 4.07%Amazon.com Inc 4.39%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 4.01%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08%
Verizon Communications Inc 3.96%Alphabet Inc 3.28%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 3.84%Meta Platforms Inc 3.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DDDD and XQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DDDDXQQIDDDDXQQIDDDDXQQI
3 months+4.9%−2.7%1.6%4.8%+2.6 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+10.5%+21.8%1.7%11.4%−7.6 pts−2.4 pts
Since launch+8.7%+14.3%1.6%13.7%−6.5 pts−2.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDDD and XQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDDD
YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxNEOS
Strategysynthetic covered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualized18.4%20.5%
Expense ratio1.01%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026)13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+7.0%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026)+14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+15.3%+17.3%
Ahead or behind−6.5 pts−2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate67%100%
Age190 days227 days
Net assets$7m$351m

DDDD in plain words

Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XQQI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, DDDD or XQQI?
DDDD charges 1.01% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so XQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDDD against XQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDDD against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources