ACYS vs CAGE: which paid, and which earned it?
ACYS and CAGE both write options for income. FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF.
3.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.
SPY
+8.2%
ACYS
+4.4%
1.9% cash
3.8 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.
SPY
+8.2%
ACYS
+4.4%
3.8 pts behind SPY
1.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACYS and CAGE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACYS | CAGE | ACYS | CAGE | ACYS | CAGE |
| 3 months | +2.4% | +3.7% | 1.3% | 0.0% | −0.1 pts | +1.1 pts |
| Since launch ACYS Apr 2026 · CAGE Apr 2026 | +4.4% | +14.4% | 1.9% | 0.0% | −3.8 pts | +5.2 pts |
ACYS and CAGE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACYS and CAGE on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACYS in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYS paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +8.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.7%, paid monthly.
CAGE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACYS against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-cage
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACYS against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-cage Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACYS against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-cage
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACYS against CAGE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-cage
- Markdown
- [ACYS against CAGE (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-cage)