ACBE vs ACYS: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBE and ACYS both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF.

0.6%
ACBE cash paid, since launch
1.9%
ACYS cash paid, since launch
+0.7%
ACBE total return, since launch
+4.4%
ACYS total return, since launch
ACBE · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBE
+0.7%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBE

+0.7%

about even with SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.

ACYS · since launch to Sep 30, 20263.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS
+4.4%
SPY
+8.2%

3.8 pts behind SPY

ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

SPY

+8.2%

ACYS

+4.4%

1.9% as cash

3.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts behind SPY

ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

SPY

+8.2%

ACYS

+4.4%

3.8 pts behind SPY

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.2%. ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBEACYSACBEACYSACBEACYS
3 monthsnot published+2.4%not published1.3%not published−0.1 pts
Since launch
ACBE Sep 2026 · ACYS Apr 2026
+0.7%+4.4%0.6%1.9%−0.2 pts−3.8 pts

ACBE and ACYS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBE
Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
ACYS
FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer Pacer First Trust
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.9% 7.7%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 1.9% (since launch on Apr 23, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.1% +2.4%
Total return, 1 year +0.7% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +4.4% (since launch on Apr 23, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +8.2%
Ahead or behind −0.2 pts −3.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 20 days 160 days
Net assets $3m $502m

ACBE and ACYS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.

ACYS in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYS paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +8.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBE or ACYS?
ACBE charges 0.60% a year and ACYS charges 0.75%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBE against ACYS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acys

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.