ACBH vs ACYS: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and ACYS both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF.

0.8%
ACBH cash paid, since launch
1.9%
ACYS cash paid, since launch
+1.3%
ACBH total return, since launch
+4.4%
ACYS total return, since launch
ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBH
+1.3%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

ACYS · since launch to Sep 30, 20263.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS
+4.4%
SPY
+8.2%

3.8 pts behind SPY

ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

SPY

+8.2%

ACYS

+4.4%

1.9% as cash

3.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts behind SPY

ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

SPY

+8.2%

ACYS

+4.4%

3.8 pts behind SPY

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.2%. ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBHACYSACBHACYSACBHACYS
3 monthsnot published+2.4%not published1.3%not published−0.1 pts
Since launch
ACBH Sep 2026 · ACYS Apr 2026
+1.3%+4.4%0.8%1.9%+0.4 pts−3.8 pts

ACBH and ACYS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH
Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
ACYS
FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer Pacer First Trust
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 7.7%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 1.9% (since launch on Apr 23, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.4% +2.4%
Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +4.4% (since launch on Apr 23, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +8.2%
Ahead or behind +0.4 pts −3.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 20 days 160 days
Net assets $3m $502m

ACBH and ACYS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

ACYS in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYS paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +8.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or ACYS?
ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ACYS charges 0.75%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against ACYS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acys

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.