Which is cheaper, ACBH or ACRT?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ACRT charges 0.72%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACBH vs ACRT: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and ACRT both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

0.0%

ACRT cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

−8.7%

ACRT total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

ACRT · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with IWM

ACRT

−8.7%

IWM

−8.7%

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.3%. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	ACRT	ACBH	ACRT	ACBH	ACRT
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · ACRT Aug 2026	+1.3%	−8.7%	0.8%	0.0%	+0.4 pts	0.0 pts

ACBH and ACRT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

ACRT

ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM

Issuer Pacer ProShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Russell 2000 (IWM)

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% not published

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.72%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% −8.7%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) −8.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% −8.7%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts 0.0 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 47 days

Net assets $3m $1m

ACBH and ACRT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

ACRT in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or ACRT?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ACRT charges 0.72%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs MRA ACBH vs MSR ACBH vs OCTH ACBH vs OCTJ ACRT vs FTKI ACRT vs ITWO ACRT vs IWMI ACRT vs IWMW

S&P 500 (SPY) →Russell 2000 (IWM) →ACBH on its own →ACRT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗ACRT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACRT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for ACRT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acrt

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.