Which is cheaper, ACBH or MRA?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACBH vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and MRA both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

13.7%

MRA cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

+4.6%

MRA total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA

+4.6%

MARA

−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

13.7% as cash

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +4.6%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	MRA	ACBH	MRA	ACBH	MRA
3 months	not published	+7.2%	not published	7.5%	not published	+22.4 pts
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · MRA May 2026	+1.3%	+4.6%	0.8%	13.7%	+0.4 pts	+25.5 pts

ACBH and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

MRA

GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly

Issuer Pacer GraniteShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MARA (MARA)

Pays not established monthly

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 45.3%

Expense ratio 0.60% 1.07%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% −10.4%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% −20.9%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts +25.5 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 126 days

Net assets $3m $1m

ACBH and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or MRA?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs ACYQ ACBH vs ACYS ACBH vs AHD ACBH vs ANV MRA vs ACYS MRA vs AHD MRA vs ANV MRA vs APRH

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBH on its own →MRA on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗MRA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MRA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for MRA ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-mra

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.