ANV vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?
ANV and MRA both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
Total return, distributions reinvested
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | MRA | ANV | MRA | ANV | MRA |
| 3 months | +5.3% | +7.2% | 2.5% | 7.5% | −10.4 pts | +22.4 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts | not published |
| Since launch ANV Feb 2026 · MRA May 2026 | +13.2% | +4.6% | 9.5% | 13.7% | −13.8 pts | +25.5 pts |
ANV and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ANV and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
MRA in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ANV against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mra
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANV against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mra Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ANV against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mra
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ANV against MRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mra
- Markdown
- [ANV against MRA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-mra)