ANV vs JANQ: which paid, and which earned it?

ANV and JANQ both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January.

9.5%
ANV cash paid, since launch
0.0%
JANQ cash paid, since launch
+13.2%
ANV total return, since launch
0.0%
JANQ total return, since launch
ANV · since launch to Sep 30, 202613.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV
+13.2%
NVDA
+26.9%

13.8 pts behind NVDA

ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.

NVDA

+26.9%

ANV

+13.2%

9.5% of it arrived as cash

13.8 pts behind NVDA

Total return, distributions reinvested

13.8 pts behind NVDA

ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.

NVDA

+26.9%

ANV

+13.2%

13.8 pts behind NVDA

9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.

JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY
JANQ
0.0%
SPY
+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowANVJANQANVJANQANVJANQ
3 months+5.3%not published2.5%not published−10.4 ptsnot published
6 months+11.1%not published6.8%not published−19.2 ptsnot published
Since launch
ANV Feb 2026 · JANQ Sep 2026
+13.2%0.0%9.5%0.0%−13.8 pts−0.9 pts

ANV and JANQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ANV
GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF · Autocallable on NVDA, paying monthly
JANQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY
Issuer GraniteShares Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark NVIDIA (NVDA) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 13.9% not published
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 9.5% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +3.0% 0.0%
Total return, 1 year +13.2% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +26.9% +0.9%
Ahead or behind −13.8 pts −0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 5% not published
Age 239 days 20 days
Net assets $7m not published

ANV and JANQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ANV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ANV or JANQ?
ANV charges 1.07% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so JANQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ANV against JANQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-janq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.