ANV vs MSR: which paid, and which earned it?
ANV and MSR both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
16.6 pts behind MSTR
MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.
MSTR
−17.0%
MSR
−33.6%
16.6 pts behind MSTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
16.6 pts behind MSTR
MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.
MSTR
−17.0%
MSR
−33.6%
16.6 pts behind MSTR
5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | MSR | ANV | MSR | ANV | MSR |
| 3 months | +5.3% | +14.9% | 2.5% | 4.1% | −10.4 pts | −49.0 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts | not published |
| Since launch ANV Feb 2026 · MSR May 2026 | +13.2% | −33.6% | 9.5% | 5.2% | −13.8 pts | −16.6 pts |
ANV and MSR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ANV and MSR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
MSR in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MSR paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 38.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −33.6%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −17.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 44.3%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ANV against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-msr
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANV against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-msr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ANV against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-msr
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ANV against MSR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-msr
- Markdown
- [ANV against MSR (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-msr)