CAIQ vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?
CAIQ and MRA both write options for income. Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
13.7% as cash
7.3 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
7.3 pts behind QQQ
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
Total return, distributions reinvested
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CAIQ | MRA | CAIQ | MRA | CAIQ | MRA |
| 3 months | +2.6% | +7.2% | 2.9% | 7.5% | +0.5 pts | +22.4 pts |
| 6 months | +18.4% | not published | 8.0% | not published | −8.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch CAIQ Nov 2025 · MRA May 2026 | +19.6% | +4.6% | 13.7% | 13.7% | −7.3 pts | +25.5 pts |
CAIQ and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CAIQ and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid monthly.
MRA in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CAIQ against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-mra
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-mra Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CAIQ against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-mra
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). CAIQ against MRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-mra
- Markdown
- [CAIQ against MRA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-mra)