MRA vs MSR: which paid, and which earned it?

MRA and MSR both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF.

13.7%
MRA cash paid, since launch
5.2%
MSR cash paid, since launch
+4.6%
MRA total return, since launch
−33.6%
MSR total return, since launch
MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA
+4.6%
MARA
−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MSR · since launch to Sep 30, 202616.6 pts behind MSTR
MSR
−33.6%
MSTR
−17.0%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +4.6%. MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMRAMSRMRAMSRMRAMSR
3 months+7.2%+14.9%7.5%4.1%+22.4 pts−49.0 pts
Since launch
MRA May 2026 · MSR May 2026
+4.6%−33.6%13.7%5.2%+25.5 pts−16.6 pts

MRA and MSR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MRA
GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly
MSR
GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF · Autocallable on MSTR
Issuer GraniteShares GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark MARA (MARA) MicroStrategy (MSTR)
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 45.3% 44.3%
Expense ratio 1.07% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026) 5.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −10.4% −38.4%
Total return, 1 year +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026) −33.6% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −20.9% −17.0%
Ahead or behind +25.5 pts −16.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 0%
Age 126 days 141 days
Net assets $1m $593,832

MRA and MSR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

MSR in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MSR paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 38.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −33.6%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −17.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 44.3%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MRA or MSR?
MRA charges 1.07% a year and MSR charges 1.07%, so MRA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MRA against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mra-vs-msr

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.