ATCL vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?
ATCL and MRA both write options for income. REX Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7.9% as cash
7 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7 pts behind SPY
7.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
13.7% cash
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
Total return, distributions reinvested
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
MARA
−20.9%
MRA
+4.6%
25.5 pts ahead of MARA
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +12.0%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ATCL | MRA | ATCL | MRA | ATCL | MRA |
| 3 months | +1.4% | +7.2% | 3.4% | 7.5% | −1.1 pts | +22.4 pts |
| 6 months | +7.5% | not published | 7.0% | not published | −9.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch ATCL Feb 2026 · MRA May 2026 | +5.0% | +4.6% | 7.9% | 13.7% | −7.0 pts | +25.5 pts |
ATCL and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ATCL and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ATCL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATCL paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. REX estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Aug 19, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
MRA in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ATCL against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atcl-vs-mra
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ATCL against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atcl-vs-mra Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ATCL against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atcl-vs-mra
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ATCL against MRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atcl-vs-mra
- Markdown
- [ATCL against MRA (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atcl-vs-mra)