CAGE vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?

CAGE and MRA both write options for income. Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.

0.0%
CAGE cash paid, since launch
13.7%
MRA cash paid, since launch
+14.4%
CAGE total return, since launch
+4.6%
MRA total return, since launch
CAGE · since launch to Sep 30, 20265.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE
+14.4%
SPY
+9.2%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

SPY

+9.2%

CAGE

+14.4%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

SPY

+9.2%

CAGE

+14.4%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA
+4.6%
MARA
−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

13.7% cash

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowCAGEMRACAGEMRACAGEMRA
3 months+3.7%+7.2%0.0%7.5%+1.1 pts+22.4 pts
Since launch
CAGE Apr 2026 · MRA May 2026
+14.4%+4.6%0.0%13.7%+5.2 pts+25.5 pts

CAGE and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CAGE
Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF · Autocallable on SPY
MRA
GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly
Issuer Calamos GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MARA (MARA)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized not published 45.3%
Expense ratio 0.74% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Apr 16, 2026) 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +14.4% −10.4%
Total return, 1 year +14.4% (since launch on Apr 16, 2026) +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +9.2% −20.9%
Ahead or behind +5.2 pts +25.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 167 days 126 days
Net assets $14m $1m

CAGE and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CAGE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAGE or MRA?
CAGE charges 0.74% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so CAGE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CAGE against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-mra

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.