Which is cheaper, MRA or OCTH?

MRA charges 1.07% a year and OCTH charges 0.79%, so OCTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

MRA vs OCTH: which paid, and which earned it?

MRA and OCTH both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October.

13.7%

MRA cash paid, since launch

6.5%

OCTH cash paid, 1 year

+4.6%

MRA total return, since launch

+5.7%

OCTH total return, 1 year

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA

+4.6%

MARA

−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

OCTH · 1 year to Sep 30, 202610 pts behind SPY

OCTH

+5.7%

SPY

+15.7%

10 pts behind SPY

OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price −0.9%, total +5.7%, SPY +15.7%, −10.0 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

OCTH

+5.7%

6.5% as cash

10 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

10 pts behind SPY

OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price −0.9%, total +5.7%, SPY +15.7%, −10.0 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

OCTH

+5.7%

10 pts behind SPY

6.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price −0.9%, total +5.7%, SPY +15.7%, −10.0 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	MRA	OCTH	MRA	OCTH	MRA	OCTH
3 months	+7.2%	+0.9%	7.5%	1.6%	+22.4 pts	−1.6 pts
6 months	not published	+4.5%	not published	3.3%	not published	−12.5 pts
1 year	not published	+5.7%	not published	6.5%	not published	−10.0 pts
Since launch MRA May 2026 · OCTH Oct 2023	+4.6%	+22.8%	13.7%	20.7%	+25.5 pts	−62.3 pts

MRA and OCTH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MRA

GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly

OCTH

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer GraniteShares Innovator

Strategy autocallable defined income

Benchmark MARA (MARA) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays monthly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 45.3% 6.5%

Expense ratio 1.07% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026) 6.5%

Price change, 1 year −10.4% −0.9%

Total return, 1 year +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026) +5.7%

Benchmark return, 1 year −20.9% +15.7%

Ahead or behind +25.5 pts −10.0 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 126 days 1094 days

Net assets $1m $16m

MRA and OCTH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

OCTH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, OCTH paid 6.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MRA or OCTH?: MRA charges 1.07% a year and OCTH charges 0.79%, so OCTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

MRA vs MSR MRA vs ACBE MRA vs ACBH MRA vs ACEI OCTH vs QYLD OCTH vs QYLG OCTH vs RDVI OCTH vs RECI

S&P 500 (SPY) →MRA on its own →OCTH on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

MRA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MRA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for MRA ↗OCTH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗OCTH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Innovator page for OCTH ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, MRA against OCTH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mra-vs-octh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.