ACEI vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACEI and MRA both write options for income. Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.

11.1%
ACEI cash paid, 1 year
13.7%
MRA cash paid, since launch
+5.9%
ACEI total return, 1 year
+4.6%
MRA total return, since launch
ACEI · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.8 pts behind SPY
ACEI
+5.9%
SPY
+15.7%

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

11.1% cash

9.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.8 pts behind SPY

ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

ACEI

+5.9%

9.8 pts behind SPY

11.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACEI over 1 year: paid 11.1%, price −5.7%, total +5.9%, SPY +15.7%, −9.8 pts.

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA
+4.6%
MARA
−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACEIMRAACEIMRAACEIMRA
3 months+5.4%+7.2%3.3%7.5%+2.8 pts+22.4 pts
6 months+5.6%not published6.5%not published−11.4 ptsnot published
1 year+5.9%not published11.1%not published−9.8 ptsnot published
Since launch
ACEI Sep 2025 · MRA May 2026
+6.0%+4.6%11.1%13.7%−11.2 pts+25.5 pts

ACEI and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACEI
Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
MRA
GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MARA (MARA)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 13.0% 45.3%
Expense ratio 0.79% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 11.1% 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −5.7% −10.4%
Total return, 1 year +5.9% +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.7% −20.9%
Ahead or behind −9.8 pts +25.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 370 days 126 days
Net assets $50m $1m

ACEI and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACEI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACEI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACEI or MRA?
ACEI charges 0.79% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACEI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACEI against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acei-vs-mra

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.