IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

OCTH vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLG paid 16.7% of its price in cash against OCTH’s 6.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OCTH and QYLG

Net assets: $16m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October, and $183m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

OCTH on its own →QYLG on its own →
At a glance
6.5%
OCTH cash paid, 1 year
16.7%
QYLG cash paid, 1 year
+7.5%
OCTH total return, 1 year
+14.4%
QYLG total return, 1 year
OCTH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.3 pts behind SPY
OCTH
+7.5%
SPY
+14.8%

7.3 pts behind SPY

OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price +0.8%, total +7.5%, SPY +14.8%, −7.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OCTH

+7.5%

6.5% of it arrived as cash

7.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.3 pts behind SPY

OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price +0.8%, total +7.5%, SPY +14.8%, −7.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OCTH

+7.5%

7.3 pts behind SPY

6.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price +0.8%, total +7.5%, SPY +14.8%, −7.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.1 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLG
+14.4%
QQQ
+12.3%

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLG

+14.4%

16.7% of it arrived as cash

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLG

+14.4%

16.7% as cash

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

16.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QYLG costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; QYLG is 11.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OCTH vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOCTHQYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+7.5%+14.4%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.8%fell 3.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$16m$183m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OCTH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score68OCTH49.4QYLG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, OCTH and QYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OCTH QYLG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OCTH
Only in QYLG
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.13%
APPLE INC. 7.59%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.78%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.89%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.29%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.59%
ALPHABET INC. 3.47%
ALPHABET INC. 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator Global X
Strategy defined income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.4% 7.1%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.5% 16.7%
Price change, 1 year +0.8% −3.9%
Total return, 1 year +7.5% +14.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −7.3 pts +2.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 51% 93%
Age 3.1 years 6.1 years
Net assets, OCTH as of Nov 4, 2026 and QYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 $16m $183m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OCTH vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowOCTHQYLGOCTHQYLGOCTHQYLG
3 months+1.2%−0.8%1.6%1.6%+1.4 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+2.9%+2.5%3.2%4.0%−2.2 pts+2.8 pts
1 year+7.5%+14.4%6.5%16.7%−7.3 pts+2.1 pts
3 years+22.0%+72.0%20.4%52.1%−60.9 pts−19.4 pts
Since launchNot the same days: OCTH Oct 2023 · QYLG Sep 2020+23.8%+116.2%20.7%76.4%−62.2 pts−46.8 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

OCTH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OCTH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OCTH paid 6.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLG paid 16.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OCTH or QYLG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OCTH paid 6.5% of its starting price in cash and QYLG paid 16.7%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OCTH or QYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, OCTH returned +7.5% and QYLG +14.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OCTH or QYLG?
OCTH charges 0.79% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
OCTH vs QQQYOCTH vs TDAQOCTH vs CAIQOCTH vs IQQQQYLG vs WDTEQYLG vs BALIQYLG vs XYLDQYLG vs SPYI
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →OCTH on its own →QYLG on its own →OCTH dividend history →QYLG dividend history →QYLG holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
OCTH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
OCTH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
OCTH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Innovator page for OCTH ↗
QYLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
QYLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
QYLG 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Global X page for QYLG ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OCTH against QYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/octh-vs-qylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.