Data as of .
QYLG vs WDTE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year WDTE paid 28.0% of its price in cash against QYLG’s 17.4%, though QYLG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and WDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QYLG | Only in WDTE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 8.44% | Spx Us 12/18/26 C600 92.83% |
| APPLE INC 7.73% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 6.61% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.77% | Cash & Other 0.69% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99% | Spx 09/21/2026 7674.22 C 0.11% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.31% | Spx 09/21/2026 7650.5 C -0.24% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.23% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLG | WDTE | QYLG | WDTE | QYLG | WDTE | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | +3.2% | 2.1% | 7.4% | +2.4 pts | +0.9 pts |
| 6 months | +19.6% | +17.3% | 4.6% | 15.7% | −4.7 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 1 year | +22.2% | +15.8% | 17.4% | 28.0% | +0.5 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 3 years | +76.2% | +49.2% | 51.1% | 77.8% | −22.0 pts | −29.2 pts |
| Since launch | +122.0% | +49.2% | 75.3% | 77.8% | −52.0 pts | −29.2 pts |
| QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF Option income on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Defiance |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.8% | 29.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 1.03% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 17.4% | 28.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.4% | −14.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +15.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.5 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 96% | 38% |
| Age | 2187 days | 1095 days |
| Net assets | $175m | $71m |
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
WDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, WDTE paid 28.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 38% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QYLG or WDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and WDTE paid 28.0%, so WDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or WDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and WDTE returned +15.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QYLG or WDTE?
- QYLG charges 0.35% a year and WDTE charges 1.03%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against WDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-wdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.