Data as of .
QYLG vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against XRMI’s 12.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and XRMI hold 56% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QYLG | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 8.44% | 8.27% |
| APPLE INC | 7.73% | 7.54% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.77% | 5.63% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.31% | 3.82% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.23% | 3.15% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.67% | 2.61% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.00% | 2.50% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.11% | 2.26% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.99% | 1.76% |
| TESLA INC | 3.01% | 1.58% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.97% | 1.40% |
| INTEL CORP | 2.48% | 0.82% |
| Only in QYLG | Only in XRMI |
|---|---|
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.46% |
| ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS 0.68% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.44% |
| SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.67% | ELI LILLY & CO 1.42% |
| ARM HOLDINGS PLC-ADR 0.52% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.04% |
| MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.39% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.00% |
| STRATEGY INC- CL A 0.24% | VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 0.96% |
| ASTERA LABS INC 0.23% | ABBVIE INC 0.72% |
| NEBIUS GROUP NV 0.23% | MASTERCARD INC - A 0.69% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLG | XRMI | QYLG | XRMI | QYLG | XRMI | |
| 3 months | −0.1% | +3.5% | 2.1% | 3.0% | +2.4 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +19.6% | +8.9% | 4.6% | 6.3% | −4.7 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | +22.2% | +10.3% | 17.4% | 12.1% | +0.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | +76.2% | +27.2% | 51.1% | 33.3% | −22.0 pts | −51.2 pts |
| Since launch | +122.0% | +17.0% | 75.3% | 43.8% | −52.0 pts | −66.1 pts |
| QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.8% | 12.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 17.4% | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.4% | −2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +10.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 96% | 95% |
| Age | 2187 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $175m | $60m |
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QYLG or XRMI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or XRMI?
- With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QYLG or XRMI?
- QYLG charges 0.35% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.