Data as of .
DRKY vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
DRKY and QYLG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DRKY and QYLG hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DRKY | QYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 4.31% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.45% | 3.23% |
| Tesla Inc | 2.07% | 3.01% |
| Sandisk Corp | 3.51% | 1.14% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 4.52% | 0.85% |
| Only in DRKY | Only in QYLG |
|---|---|
| Natera Inc 25.22% | NVIDIA CORP 8.44% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 9.17% | APPLE INC 7.73% |
| STMicroelectronics NV 7.49% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.77% |
| YPF SA 4.78% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99% |
| Insmed Inc 4.62% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97% |
| BBB Foods Inc 4.29% | META PLATFORMS INC 3.11% |
| CDW Corp/DE 3.92% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.00% |
| Fox Corp 3.89% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRKY | QYLG | DRKY | QYLG | DRKY | QYLG | |
| 3 months | +11.8% | −0.1% | 3.8% | 2.1% | +9.6 pts | +2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +25.1% | +19.6% | 8.1% | 4.6% | +7.1 pts | −4.7 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +22.2% | not published | 17.4% | not published | +0.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +76.2% | not published | 51.1% | not published | −22.0 pts |
| Since launch | +24.1% | +122.0% | 14.1% | 75.3% | +9.7 pts | −52.0 pts |
| DRKY VistaShares Target 15 DRUKMacro Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 14.8% | 6.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.1% (since launch on Oct 8, 2025) | 17.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.1% | +2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.1% (since launch on Oct 8, 2025) | +22.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.4% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +9.7 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 96% |
| Age | 345 days | 2187 days |
| Net assets | $19m | $175m |
DRKY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 8, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, DRKY paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +14.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 9.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.8%, paid monthly.
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DRKY or QYLG?
- DRKY charges 0.95% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DRKY against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/drky-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.