ACBH vs ANV: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBH and ANV both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF.
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBH | ANV | ACBH | ANV | ACBH | ANV |
| 3 months | not published | +5.3% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −10.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts |
| Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · ANV Feb 2026 | +1.3% | +13.2% | 0.8% | 9.5% | +0.4 pts | −13.8 pts |
ACBH and ANV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBH and ANV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBH in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBH against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-anv
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBH against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-anv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBH against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-anv
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBH against ANV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-anv
- Markdown
- [ACBH against ANV (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-anv)