ANV vs CAIQ: which paid, and which earned it?
ANV and CAIQ both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
13.7% of it arrived as cash
7.3 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
7.3 pts behind QQQ
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | CAIQ | ANV | CAIQ | ANV | CAIQ |
| 3 months | +5.3% | +2.6% | 2.5% | 2.9% | −10.4 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | +18.4% | 6.8% | 8.0% | −19.2 pts | −8.4 pts |
| Since launch ANV Feb 2026 · CAIQ Nov 2025 | +13.2% | +19.6% | 9.5% | 13.7% | −13.8 pts | −7.3 pts |
ANV and CAIQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ANV and CAIQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
CAIQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ANV against CAIQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-caiq
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANV against CAIQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-caiq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ANV against CAIQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-caiq
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ANV against CAIQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-caiq
- Markdown
- [ANV against CAIQ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-caiq)