ANV vs ATCL: which paid, and which earned it?
ANV and ATCL both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF and REX Autocallable Income ETF.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7.9% as cash
7 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7 pts behind SPY
7.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ANV | ATCL | ANV | ATCL | ANV | ATCL |
| 3 months | +5.3% | +1.4% | 2.5% | 3.4% | −10.4 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | +11.1% | +7.5% | 6.8% | 7.0% | −19.2 pts | −9.5 pts |
| Since launch ANV Feb 2026 · ATCL Feb 2026 | +13.2% | +5.0% | 9.5% | 7.9% | −13.8 pts | −7.0 pts |
ANV and ATCL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ANV and ATCL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
ATCL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATCL paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. REX estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Aug 19, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ANV against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-atcl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANV against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-atcl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ANV against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-atcl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ANV against ATCL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-atcl
- Markdown
- [ANV against ATCL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/anv-vs-atcl)