ACQQ vs ANV: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and ANV both write options for income. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF.
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
9.5% of it arrived as cash
13.8 pts behind NVDA
Total return, distributions reinvested
13.8 pts behind NVDA
ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
NVDA
+26.9%
ANV
+13.2%
13.8 pts behind NVDA
9.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. ANV since launch: paid 9.5%, price +3.0%, total +13.2%, NVDA +26.9%, −13.8 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACQQ | ANV | ACQQ | ANV | ACQQ | ANV |
| 3 months | not published | +5.3% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −10.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +11.1% | not published | 6.8% | not published | −19.2 pts |
| Since launch ACQQ Aug 2026 · ANV Feb 2026 | +1.6% | +13.2% | 0.0% | 9.5% | +0.3 pts | −13.8 pts |
ACQQ and ANV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACQQ and ANV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +1.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
ANV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ANV paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 5% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACQQ against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-anv
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-anv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACQQ against ANV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-anv
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACQQ against ANV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-anv
- Markdown
- [ACQQ against ANV (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-anv)