Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAIQ vs CVRD: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and CVRD both write options for income.

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and Madison Covered Call ETF.

13.7%CAIQ cash paid, 1 year
7.4%CVRD cash paid, 1 year
+16.7%CAIQ total return, 1 year
+5.6%CVRD total return, 1 year
CAIQ7 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% of it arrived as cash7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% cash7 pts behind QQQ
CVRD11 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%7.4% as cash11 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%11 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and CVRD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in CAIQOnly in CVRD
Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00%Palo Alto Networks Inc 4.84%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 4.58%
Danaher Corp 4.32%
Amazon.com Inc 4.06%
Agilent Technologies Inc 3.98%
Microsoft Corp 3.88%
Visa Inc 3.68%
Broadcom Inc 3.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CAIQ and CVRD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CAIQCVRDCAIQCVRDCAIQCVRD
3 months−0.5%+4.0%4.3%1.7%+1.9 pts+1.7 pts
6 months+16.5%+5.7%9.5%3.3%−7.7 pts−12.3 pts
1 yearnot published+5.6%not published7.4%not published−11.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+19.5%not published25.9%not published−58.9 pts
Since launch+16.7%+21.1%13.7%26.3%−7.0 pts−59.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAIQ and CVRD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerCalamosMadison
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized17.9%6.5%
Expense ratio0.74%0.92%
Cash paid, 1 year13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)7.4%
Price change, 1 year+2.1%−2.2%
Total return, 1 year+16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)+5.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−7.0 pts−11.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age302 days1123 days
Net assets$167m$32m

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.

CVRD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or CVRD?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and CVRD charges 0.92%, so CAIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAIQ against CVRD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against CVRD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-cvrd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources