Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAIQ vs GRNI: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and GRNI both write options for income.

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF.

13.7%CAIQ cash paid, 1 year
7.8%GRNI cash paid, 1 year
+16.7%CAIQ total return, 1 year
+14.5%GRNI total return, 1 year
CAIQ7 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% of it arrived as cash7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% cash7 pts behind QQQ
GRNI2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%GRNI+14.5%7.8% of it arrived as cash2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%GRNI+14.5%2.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and GRNI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in CAIQOnly in GRNI
Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.11%
Quanta Services Inc 3.23%
GE Vernova Inc 3.08%
Strategy Inc 3.04%
Amazon.com Inc 2.99%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%
Broadcom Inc 2.90%
Arista Networks Inc 2.86%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CAIQ and GRNI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CAIQGRNICAIQGRNICAIQGRNI
3 months−0.5%+2.1%4.3%2.5%+1.9 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+16.5%+16.3%9.5%5.4%−7.7 pts−1.8 pts
Since launch+16.7%+14.5%13.7%7.8%−7.0 pts−2.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAIQ and GRNI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
GRNI
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerCalamosFundstrat
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized17.9%10.0%
Expense ratio0.74%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)7.8% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025)
Price change, 1 year+2.1%+6.2%
Total return, 1 year+16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)+14.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−7.0 pts−2.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age302 days304 days
Net assets$167m$49m

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.

GRNI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GRNI paid 7.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or GRNI?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and GRNI charges 0.99%, so CAIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAIQ against GRNI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against GRNI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-grni Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources