Data as of .
CAIQ vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
CAIQ and XQQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and XQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CAIQ | Only in XQQI |
|---|---|
| Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00% | NVIDIA Corp 8.70% |
| Apple Inc 7.91% | |
| Microsoft Corp 5.94% | |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.12% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.39% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.28% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAIQ | XQQI | CAIQ | XQQI | CAIQ | XQQI | |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −2.7% | 4.3% | 4.8% | +1.9 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +16.5% | +21.8% | 9.5% | 11.4% | −7.7 pts | −2.4 pts |
| Since launch | +16.7% | +14.3% | 13.7% | 13.7% | −7.0 pts | −2.9 pts |
| CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Calamos | NEOS |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 17.9% | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025) | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.1% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025) | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.6% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −7.0 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 302 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $167m | $351m |
CAIQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, CAIQ or XQQI?
- CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so CAIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.