Data as of .
CAIQ vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?
CAIQ and QDTY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CAIQ | Only in QDTY |
|---|---|
| Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00% | NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19% |
| XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21% | |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAIQ | QDTY | CAIQ | QDTY | CAIQ | QDTY | |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −0.9% | 4.3% | 7.9% | +1.9 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +16.5% | +20.7% | 9.5% | 17.3% | −7.7 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +20.2% | not published | 30.9% | not published | −1.6 pts |
| Since launch | +16.7% | +27.1% | 13.7% | 42.0% | −7.0 pts | −8.5 pts |
| CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | QDTY YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Calamos | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 1.17% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025) | 30.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.1% | −14.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025) | +20.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.6% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −7.0 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 94% |
| Age | 302 days | 582 days |
| Net assets | $167m | $27m |
CAIQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.
QDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, CAIQ or QDTY?
- CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so CAIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.