Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against QDTY’s 30.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 39.9QDTY 373.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and QDTY hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QDTE and QDTY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQDTEQDTY
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20313.90%0.53%
Only in each
Only in QDTEOnly in QDTY
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and QDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTEQDTYQDTEQDTYQDTEQDTY
3 months−0.9%−0.9%7.6%7.9%+1.6 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+19.7%+20.7%16.2%17.3%−4.5 pts−3.6 pts
1 year+21.1%+20.2%36.1%30.9%−0.7 pts−1.6 pts
Since launch+59.9%+27.1%74.1%42.0%−4.3 pts−8.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and QDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerRoundhillYieldMax
Strategy0DTE covered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized20.8%25.9%
Expense ratio0.96%1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year36.1%30.9%
Price change, 1 year−19.2%−14.0%
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+20.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−1.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published94%
Age925 days582 days
Net assets$967m$27m

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or QDTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.9%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or QDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +21.1% and QDTY returned +20.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or QDTY?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against QDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources