Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs QYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.8% of its price in cash against QYLD’s 12.5% and the two finished level on total return.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

36.8%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
12.5%QYLD cash paid, 1 year
+22.3%QDTE total return, 1 year
+22.2%QYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 44.7QYLD 77.53.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
QYLD0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QYLD+22.2%12.5% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QYLD+22.2%12.5% cash0.7 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and QYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QDTEOnly in QYLD
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01%NVIDIA CORP 8.46%
4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19%APPLE INC 7.81%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18%MICROSOFT CORP 5.90%
4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.86%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05%AMAZON.COM INC 4.42%
First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.72%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.16%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and QYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTEQYLDQDTEQYLDQDTEQYLD
3 months+1.0%+4.7%7.8%3.0%+1.8 pts+5.5 pts
6 months+16.9%+11.8%15.9%6.2%−3.8 pts−8.9 pts
1 year+22.3%+22.2%36.8%12.5%−0.7 pts−0.7 pts
3 yearsnot published+51.3%not published36.6%not published−43.8 pts
Since launch+58.3%+195.4%73.8%116.0%−4.3 pts−639.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and QYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillGlobal X
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized24.3%11.9%
Expense ratio0.96%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year36.8%12.5%
Price change, 1 year−18.5%+8.4%
Total return, 1 year+22.3%+22.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+23.0%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age918 days4656 days

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or QYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.5%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or QYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +22.3% and QYLD returned +22.2% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or QYLD?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against QYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against QYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-qyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources