Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QDTE vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its price in cash against QYLD’s 12.3%, though QYLD returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QDTE and QYLD

Net assets: $881m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $8.5bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
34.7%
QDTE cash paid, 1 year
12.3%
QYLD cash paid, 1 year
+13.7%
QDTE total return, 1 year
+16.5%
QYLD total return, 1 year
QDTE · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE
+13.7%
QQQ
+12.3%

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTE

+13.7%

34.7% of it arrived as cash

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTE

+13.7%

34.7% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

34.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QYLD costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; QYLD is 8.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QDTE vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQDTEQYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+16.5%
Price change, 1 yearfell 23.4%rose 3.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.96%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$950m$8.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · QYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score32.6QDTE72.8QYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 137 weekly returns · each against QQQ
QDTE QYLD
Return
Total return edge QDTE +58.0% +39.1%
Annualized edge QDTE +19.0% +13.3%
Price return edge QYLD −40.2% +0.4%
Risk
Volatility edge QYLD 17.8% 12.3%
Max drawdown edge QYLD −20.5% −17.5%
Downside capture 91.4% 60.2%
Beta 0.85 0.53
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QDTE 0.83 0.73
Sortino edge QDTE 1.20 1.04
Treynor 0.172 0.170
Calmar edge QDTE 0.92 0.76
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.1% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.37 0.15
Information ratio −0.22 −0.61
Tracking error 5.7% 11.3%
Reading

From Mar 2024 to Oct 2026, QDTE returned more: +58.0% to +39.1%. QYLD swung less: 12.3% to 17.8%. QYLD fell less at its worst: −17.5% to −20.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QDTE vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQDTEQYLDQQQEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+58.0%+39.1%QDTEPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.0%+13.3%QDTETotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−40.2%+0.4%QYLDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.8%12.3%QYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.2%8.6%QYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−20.5%−17.5%QYLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture81.9%39.1%100.0%QDTEShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.4%60.2%100.0%QYLDShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.850.531.00QYLD lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.930.751.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.830.73QDTEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.201.04QDTEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1720.1700.159TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.920.76QDTEAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQQQQQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.1% a year+0.6% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.370.15Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.8% to +7.1%−7.0% to +8.1%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.22−0.61QDTEReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.7%11.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 137 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and QYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QDTE QYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QDTE
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 73.55%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.69%
Only in QYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.20%
APPLE INC. 7.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.82%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.93%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.32%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.62%
ALPHABET INC. 3.50%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QDTE Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Strategy 0DTE covered call covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 27.9% 12.2%
Expense ratio 0.96% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 34.7% 12.3%
Price change, 1 year −23.4% +3.3%
Total return, 1 year +13.7% +16.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +12.3%
Ahead or behind +1.4 pts +4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 99%
Age 2.7 years 12.9 years
Net assets, QDTE as of Nov 4, 2026 and QYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $881m $8.5bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QDTE vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQDTEQYLDQDTEQYLDQDTEQYLD
3 months−1.6%+2.4%6.3%3.0%+1.8 pts+5.9 pts
6 months+1.6%+5.4%14.3%6.0%+2.0 pts+5.8 pts
1 year+13.7%+16.5%34.7%12.3%+1.5 pts+4.2 pts
3 years–+52.7%–37.9%–−38.6 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QDTE Mar 2024 · QYLD Dec 2013+55.2%+194.8%75.6%117.5%−2.3 pts−610.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QDTE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QDTE

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 23.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or QYLD?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.3%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or QYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +13.7% and QYLD +16.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or QYLD?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QDTE against QYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-qyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.