Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs QQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.8% of its price in cash against QQQI’s 14.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

36.8%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
14.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+22.3%QDTE total return, 1 year
+16.9%QQQI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 44.7QQQI 553.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
QQQI6.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QQQI+16.9%14.2% of it arrived as cash6.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QQQI+16.9%14.2% cash6.1 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and QQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QDTEOnly in QQQI
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01%NVIDIA Corp 7.66%
4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19%Apple Inc 6.63%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18%Micron Technology Inc 5.61%
4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27%Microsoft Corp 4.38%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12%
First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30%Amazon.com Inc 4.05%
Tesla Inc 3.35%
Alphabet Inc 3.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and QQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTEQQQIQDTEQQQIQDTEQQQI
3 months+1.0%+0.7%7.8%3.5%+1.8 pts+1.4 pts
6 months+16.9%+13.7%15.9%7.5%−3.8 pts−7.0 pts
1 year+22.3%+16.9%36.8%14.2%−0.7 pts−6.1 pts
Since launch+58.3%+58.2%73.8%38.6%−4.3 pts−12.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and QQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillNEOS
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized24.3%14.3%
Expense ratio0.96%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year36.8%14.2%
Price change, 1 year−18.5%+1.5%
Total return, 1 year+22.3%+16.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+23.0%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−6.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published98%
Age918 days955 days

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QQQI paid 14.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or QQQI?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 14.2%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +22.3% and QQQI returned +16.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or QQQI?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against QQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against QQQI, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-qqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources