Data as of .
QDTE vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
QDTE and XQQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and XQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in XQQI |
|---|---|
| NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90% | NVIDIA Corp 8.70% |
| QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77% | Apple Inc 7.91% |
| NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64% | Microsoft Corp 5.94% |
| QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82% | Micron Technology Inc 5.12% |
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97% | Amazon.com Inc 4.39% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.28% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTE | XQQI | QDTE | XQQI | QDTE | XQQI | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | −2.7% | 7.6% | 4.8% | +1.6 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +19.7% | +21.8% | 16.2% | 11.4% | −4.5 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 1 year | +21.1% | not published | 36.1% | not published | −0.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +59.9% | +14.3% | 74.1% | 13.7% | −4.3 pts | −2.9 pts |
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | NEOS |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.8% | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 36.1% | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −19.2% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.1% | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 925 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $967m | $351m |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or XQQI?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.