ACBH vs ATCL: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and ATCL both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and REX Autocallable Income ETF.

0.8%
ACBH cash paid, since launch
7.9%
ATCL cash paid, since launch
+1.3%
ACBH total return, since launch
+5.0%
ATCL total return, since launch
ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBH
+1.3%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

ATCL · since launch to Sep 30, 20267 pts behind SPY
ATCL
+5.0%
SPY
+12.0%

7 pts behind SPY

ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.

SPY

+12.0%

ATCL

+5.0%

7.9% of it arrived as cash

7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

7 pts behind SPY

ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.

SPY

+12.0%

ATCL

+5.0%

7 pts behind SPY

7.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +12.0%. ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBHATCLACBHATCLACBHATCL
3 monthsnot published+1.4%not published3.4%not published−1.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+7.5%not published7.0%not published−9.5 pts
Since launch
ACBH Sep 2026 · ATCL Feb 2026
+1.3%+5.0%0.8%7.9%+0.4 pts−7.0 pts

ACBH and ATCL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH
Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
ATCL
REX Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer Pacer REX
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 13.7%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 7.9% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.4% −3.0%
Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +5.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +12.0%
Ahead or behind +0.4 pts −7.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 77%
Age 20 days 224 days
Net assets $3m $48m

ACBH and ATCL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

ATCL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATCL paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. REX estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Aug 19, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or ATCL?
ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ATCL charges 0.65%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-atcl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.