ACSP vs ATCL: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and ATCL both write options for income. ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and REX Autocallable Income ETF.
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7.9% of it arrived as cash
7 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
7 pts behind SPY
ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
SPY
+12.0%
ATCL
+5.0%
7 pts behind SPY
7.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +12.0%. ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and ATCL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACSP | ATCL | ACSP | ATCL | ACSP | ATCL |
| 3 months | not published | +1.4% | not published | 3.4% | not published | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +7.5% | not published | 7.0% | not published | −9.5 pts |
| Since launch ACSP Aug 2026 · ATCL Feb 2026 | −3.9% | +5.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | −2.4 pts | −7.0 pts |
ACSP and ATCL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACSP and ATCL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.
ATCL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATCL paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. REX estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Aug 19, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACSP against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-atcl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-atcl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACSP against ATCL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-atcl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACSP against ATCL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-atcl
- Markdown
- [ACSP against ATCL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-atcl)