Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs SIXH: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and SIXH both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
2.0%SIXH cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+16.3%SIXH total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
SIXHAbout even with SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%SIXH+16.3%about even with SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%SIXH+16.3%about even with SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and SIXH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in SIXH
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%Altria Group, Inc. 4.83%
Philip Morris International Inc. 4.07%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3.77%
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust 3.74%
AT&T INC. 3.59%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 3.53%
Pepsico, Inc. 3.44%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and SIXH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPSIXHACSPSIXHACSPSIXH
3 monthsnot published+4.5%not published0.5%not published+2.2 pts
6 monthsnot published+7.4%not published0.9%not published−10.6 pts
1 yearnot published+16.3%not published2.0%not published−0.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+43.8%not published6.6%not published−34.6 pts
Since launch−3.8%+96.3%0.0%16.0%−2.1 pts−88.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and SIXH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
SIXH
ETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesExchange Traded Concepts
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published0.4%
Expense ratio0.72%0.69%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)2.0%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%+14.1%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+16.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−0.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days2321 days
Net assets$27m$543m

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

SIXH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SIXH paid 2.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or SIXH?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and SIXH charges 0.69%, so SIXH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against SIXH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against SIXH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sixh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources