Data as of .
ACSP vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% | |
| YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% | |
| YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% | |
| YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% | |
| YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% | |
| YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% | |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | YMAG | ACSP | YMAG | ACSP | YMAG | |
| 3 months | not published | +6.1% | not published | 9.4% | not published | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +15.4% | not published | 21.1% | not published | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +70.7% | 0.0% | 89.1% | −2.1 pts | −34.1 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | not established | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 35 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $297m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or YMAG?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.