Data as of .
CDPI vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
CDPI and YMAG both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDPI | YMAG | CDPI | YMAG | CDPI | YMAG | |
| 3 months | not published | +6.1% | not published | 9.4% | not published | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +15.4% | not published | 21.1% | not published | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +0.5% | +70.7% | 0.7% | 89.1% | −4.1 pts | −34.1 pts |
| CDPI Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF Covered call on SCHD | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Columbia | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | not established | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.2% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.2% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +4.6% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.1 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 66 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | not published | $297m |
CDPI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, CDPI or YMAG?
- CDPI charges 0.45% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CDPI against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.