Data as of .
DDDD vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
DDDD and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and YMAG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DDDD | YMAG |
|---|---|---|
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 1.65% | 0.87% |
| Only in DDDD | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| Merck & Co Inc 4.93% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| Abbott Laboratories 4.53% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| Amgen Inc 4.38% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.30% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| Chevron Corp 4.25% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| ConocoPhillips 4.07% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 4.01% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 3.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDDD | YMAG | DDDD | YMAG | DDDD | YMAG | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +6.1% | 1.6% | 9.4% | +2.6 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +10.5% | +15.4% | 1.7% | 21.1% | −7.6 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +8.7% | +70.7% | 1.6% | 89.1% | −6.5 pts | −34.1 pts |
| DDDD YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | YieldMax |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | not established | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 18.4% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.0% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.3% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.5 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 67% | 80% |
| Age | 190 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $297m |
DDDD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DDDD or YMAG?
- DDDD charges 1.01% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so DDDD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDDD against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.