Data as of .
DDDD vs FGSI: which paid, and which earned it?
DDDD and FGSI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and FGSI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DDDD | FGSI |
|---|---|---|
| Target Corp | 1.81% | 2.22% |
| Paychex Inc | 0.95% | 1.99% |
| Cincinnati Financial Corp | 0.67% | 1.83% |
| Only in DDDD | Only in FGSI |
|---|---|
| Merck & Co Inc 4.93% | Newmont Corporation 2.70% |
| Abbott Laboratories 4.53% | Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63% |
| Amgen Inc 4.38% | Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.30% | Microsoft Corporation 2.45% |
| Chevron Corp 4.25% | Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32% |
| ConocoPhillips 4.07% | DexCom, Inc. 2.28% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 4.01% | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 3.96% | CME Group Inc. 2.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDDD | FGSI | DDDD | FGSI | DDDD | FGSI | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +2.4% | 1.6% | 2.1% | +2.6 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +10.5% | +10.0% | 1.7% | 4.4% | −7.6 pts | −8.0 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.3% | not published | 8.1% | not published | −11.3 pts |
| Since launch | +8.7% | +11.9% | 1.6% | 9.8% | −6.5 pts | −14.3 pts |
| DDDD YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY | FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | First Trust |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 18.4% | 8.6% |
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | 8.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.0% | −3.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | +5.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.3% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.5 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 67% | not published |
| Age | 190 days | 449 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $2m |
DDDD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
FGSI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DDDD or FGSI?
- DDDD charges 1.01% a year and FGSI charges 0.85%, so FGSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDDD against FGSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-fgsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.