Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FGSI vs LAPR: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year FGSI paid 8.1% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 5.9%, though LAPR returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April.

8.1%FGSI cash paid, 1 year
5.9%LAPR cash paid, 1 year
+5.3%FGSI total return, 1 year
+6.1%LAPR total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LAPR scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FGSI 33LAPR 42.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FGSI11.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%8.1% of it arrived as cash11.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%11.3 pts behind SPY
LAPR10.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%5.9% of it arrived as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%10.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and LAPR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FGSIOnly in LAPR
Newmont Corporation 2.70%TREASURY BILL 94.62%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Microsoft Corporation 2.45%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
DexCom, Inc. 2.28%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22%TREASURY BILL 0.54%
Target Corporation 2.22%TREASURY BILL 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FGSI and LAPR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FGSILAPRFGSILAPRFGSILAPR
3 months+2.4%+1.3%2.1%1.7%+0.2 pts−0.9 pts
6 months+10.0%+3.8%4.4%3.3%−8.0 pts−14.2 pts
1 year+5.3%+6.1%8.1%5.9%−11.3 pts−10.5 pts
Since launch+11.9%+16.1%9.8%13.8%−14.3 pts−34.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FGSI and LAPR on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FGSI
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Strategyoption incomebuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.6%6.7%
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year8.1%5.9%
Price change, 1 year−3.2%0.0%
Total return, 1 year+5.3%+6.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.3 pts−10.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age449 days900 days
Net assets$2m$11m

FGSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

LAPR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or LAPR?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and LAPR paid 5.9%, so FGSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or LAPR?
With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +5.3% and LAPR returned +6.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LAPR returned more.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or LAPR?
FGSI charges 0.85% a year and LAPR charges 0.79%, so LAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FGSI against LAPR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FGSI against LAPR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-lapr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources