Data as of .
ACSP vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and XQQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and XQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in XQQI |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | NVIDIA Corp 8.70% |
| Apple Inc 7.91% | |
| Microsoft Corp 5.94% | |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.12% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.39% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.28% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | XQQI | ACSP | XQQI | ACSP | XQQI | |
| 3 months | not published | −2.7% | not published | 4.8% | not published | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +21.8% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −2.4 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +14.3% | 0.0% | 13.7% | −2.1 pts | −2.9 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | NEOS |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 35 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $351m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or XQQI?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.