Which paid more, ACQQ or ACSP?

From Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACQQ paid 3.3% of its starting price in cash and ACSP paid 10.4%, so ACSP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACQQ or ACSP?

With every distribution reinvested, ACQQ returned −12.0% and ACSP −6.8% from Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or ACSP?

ACQQ and ACSP both charge 0.72% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

ACQQ vs ACSP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the window both share to Nov 4, 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% of its price in cash against ACQQ’s 3.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACQQ and ACSP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $39m for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and $57m for ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF.

ACQQ on its own →ACSP on its own →

At a glance

3.3%

ACQQ cash paid, since launch, Aug 14, 2026

10.4%

ACSP cash paid, since launch, Aug 14, 2026

−12.0%

ACQQ total return, since launch, Aug 14, 2026

−6.8%

ACSP total return, since launch, Aug 14, 2026

ACQQ · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 6.7 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ

−12.0%

QQQ

−5.3%

6.7 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −15.0%, total −12.0%, QQQ −5.3%, −6.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

−5.3%

ACQQ

−12.0%

6.7 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

6.7 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −15.0%, total −12.0%, QQQ −5.3%, −6.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

−5.3%

ACQQ

−12.0%

6.7 pts behind QQQ

3.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −15.0%, total −12.0%, QQQ −5.3%, −6.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ACSP · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP

−6.8%

SPY

−1.0%

5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

−1.0%

ACSP

−6.8%

5.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

−1.0%

ACSP

−6.8%

5.8 pts behind SPY

10.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.72% a year; ACSP is 1.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACQQ vs ACSP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	ACQQ	ACSP
Paid and earned
Measure	ACQQ	ACSP
Price change, since Aug 14, 2026	fell 15.0%	fell 16.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	88% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment	98% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	ACQQ	ACSP
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	ACQQ	ACSP
Expense ratio	0.72%	0.72%
Net assets	$39m	$57m
Holdings
Measure	ACQQ	ACSP
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and ACSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACQQ ACSP

Only in one fund ↓

Only in ACQQ

NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 99.96%

Only in ACSP

S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer ProShares ProShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 18.1% 17.5%

Expense ratio 0.72% 0.72%

Cash paid, 1 year 3.3% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) 10.4% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026)

Price change, 1 year −15.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −16.9% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026)

Total return, 1 year −12.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −6.8% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year −5.3% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −1.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026)

Ahead or behind −6.7 pts (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −5.8 pts (since launch, Aug 14, 2026)

Return of capital, latest estimate 88% 98%

Age 82 days 82 days

Net assets $39m $57m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACQQ vs ACSP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACQQ	ACSP	ACQQ	ACSP	ACQQ	ACSP
Since launchACQQ Aug 2026 · ACSP Aug 2026	−12.0%	−6.8%	3.3%	10.4%	−6.7 pts	−5.8 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

ACQQ

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACQQ paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −12.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −5.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.1%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 88% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

ACSP

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACQQ or ACSP?: From Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACQQ paid 3.3% of its starting price in cash and ACSP paid 10.4%, so ACSP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACQQ or ACSP?: With every distribution reinvested, ACQQ returned −12.0% and ACSP −6.8% from Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACQQ or ACSP?: ACQQ and ACSP both charge 0.72% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACQQ vs OMAH ACQQ vs ISPY ACQQ vs BALI ACQQ vs FTHI ACSP vs QDTY ACSP vs BALQ ACSP vs QLDY ACSP vs QRMI

Where to next

Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →ACQQ on its own →ACSP on its own →ACQQ dividend history →ACQQ holdings →ACSP dividend history →ACSP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ACQQ and ACSP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ACQQ and ACSP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ACQQ 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

ProShares page for ACQQ ↗

ACSP 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

ProShares page for ACSP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACQQ against ACSP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-acsp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.