Data as of .
ACQQ vs ACSP: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the window both share ACQQ paid 0.0% of its price in cash against ACSP’s 0.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and ACSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACQQ | Only in ACSP |
|---|---|
| NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACQQ | ACSP | ACQQ | ACSP | ACQQ | ACSP | |
| Since launch | −2.1% | −3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | −0.8 pts | −2.1 pts |
| ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ | ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | ProShares |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | not established | not established |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | not published |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.1% | −3.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.3% | −1.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.8 pts | −2.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 35 days |
| Net assets | $23m | $27m |
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, ACQQ or ACSP?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting price in cash and ACSP paid 0.0%, so ACQQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACQQ or ACSP?
- With every distribution reinvested, ACQQ returned −2.1% and ACSP returned −3.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so ACQQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, ACQQ or ACSP?
- ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and ACSP charges 0.72%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against ACSP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-acsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.