Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACQQ vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
ACQQ and OMAH both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACQQ and OMAH
Net assets: $39m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.
6.7 pts behind QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −15.0%, total −12.0%, QQQ −5.3%, −6.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
−5.3%
ACQQ
−12.0%
6.7 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
6.7 pts behind QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −15.0%, total −12.0%, QQQ −5.3%, −6.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
−5.3%
ACQQ
−12.0%
6.7 pts behind QQQ
3.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −15.0%, total −12.0%, QQQ −5.3%, −6.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% of it arrived as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
1.3 pts behind SPY
14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
ACQQ costs 0.26 points a year less; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $39m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACQQ | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +13.5% |
| Price change | fell 15.0% (since Aug 14, 2026) | fell 2.4% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 88% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $39m | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACQQ | OMAH | ACQQ | OMAH | ACQQ | OMAH |
| 3 months | – | +2.5% | – | 3.7% | – | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | – | +6.2% | – | 7.4% | – | +1.2 pts |
| 1 year | – | +13.5% | – | 14.7% | – | −1.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACQQ Aug 2026 · OMAH Mar 2025 | −12.0% | +19.2% | 3.3% | 23.7% | −6.7 pts | −14.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACQQ
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACQQ paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −12.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −5.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.1%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 88% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
OMAH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACQQ against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-omah
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACQQ against OMAH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-omah
[ACQQ against OMAH (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-omah)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.