IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

OMAH vs QRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its price in cash against QRMI’s 11.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OMAH and QRMI

Net assets: $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF, and $15m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.

OMAH on its own →QRMI on its own →
At a glance
14.7%
OMAH cash paid, 1 year
11.6%
QRMI cash paid, 1 year
+13.5%
OMAH total return, 1 year
+3.7%
QRMI total return, 1 year
OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH
+13.5%
SPY
+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QRMI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.6 pts behind QQQ
QRMI
+3.7%
QQQ
+12.3%

8.6 pts behind QQQ

QRMI over 1 year: paid 11.6%, price −8.1%, total +3.7%, QQQ +12.3%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QRMI

+3.7%

11.6% as cash

8.6 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.6 pts behind QQQ

QRMI over 1 year: paid 11.6%, price −8.1%, total +3.7%, QQQ +12.3%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QRMI

+3.7%

8.6 pts behind QQQ

11.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QRMI over 1 year: paid 11.6%, price −8.1%, total +3.7%, QQQ +12.3%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QRMI costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.8 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $15m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OMAH vs QRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOMAHQRMI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.5%+3.7%
Price change, 1 yearfell 2.4%fell 8.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.98%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$1.1bn$15m
Holdings
Holdings in common14%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OMAH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score53OMAH27.2QRMI

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

14%

By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and QRMI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

14% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OMAH QRMI
Apple Inc 10.43% 7.60%
Alphabet Inc 3.58% 3.48%
Alphabet Inc 3.58% 3.26%
Kraft Heinz Co 4.40% 0.14%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OMAH
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%
American Express Co 6.64%
Kroger Co 5.21%
Coca-Cola Co 5.08%
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%
VeriSign Inc 4.86%
Moody's Corp 4.72%
DAVITA INC 4.71%
Only in QRMI
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.14%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.78%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.90%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.29%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.60%
BROADCOM INC. 3.10%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.77%
TESLA, INC. 2.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer VistaShares Global X
Strategy covered call option income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 15.0% 12.2%
Expense ratio 0.98% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 14.7% 11.6%
Price change, 1 year −2.4% −8.1%
Total return, 1 year +13.5% +3.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −1.3 pts −8.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 1.7 years 5.2 years
Net assets, OMAH as of Nov 3, 2026 and QRMI as of Oct 12, 2026 $1.1bn $15m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OMAH vs QRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowOMAHQRMIOMAHQRMIOMAHQRMI
3 months+2.5%−0.1%3.7%3.0%+2.6 pts+3.4 pts
6 months+6.2%+1.0%7.4%5.9%+1.2 pts+1.3 pts
1 year+13.5%+3.7%14.7%11.6%−1.3 pts−8.6 pts
3 years–+25.7%–35.0%–−65.7 pts
Since launchNot the same days: OMAH Mar 2025 · QRMI Aug 2021+19.2%+8.5%23.7%42.0%−14.9 pts−83.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

OMAH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QRMI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QRMI paid 11.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or QRMI?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting price in cash and QRMI paid 11.6%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or QRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +13.5% and QRMI +3.7% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or QRMI?
OMAH charges 0.98% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
OMAH vs QDTYOMAH vs ACQQOMAH vs QQQYOMAH vs ROCQQRMI vs BALIQRMI vs FTHIQRMI vs XYLDQRMI vs DIVO
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →OMAH on its own →QRMI on its own →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →QRMI dividend history →QRMI holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
VistaShares page for OMAH ↗
QRMI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
QRMI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
QRMI 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Global X page for QRMI ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OMAH against QRMI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qrmi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.