IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

OMAH vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTY paid 30.7% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.7%, though OMAH returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OMAH and QDTY

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and $37m for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

OMAH on its own →QDTY on its own →
At a glance
14.7%
OMAH cash paid, 1 year
30.7%
QDTY cash paid, 1 year
+13.5%
OMAH total return, 1 year
+10.1%
QDTY total return, 1 year
OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH
+13.5%
SPY
+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QDTY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.2 pts behind QQQ
QDTY
+10.1%
QQQ
+12.3%

2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTY

+10.1%

30.7% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTY

+10.1%

30.7% as cash

2.2 pts behind QQQ

30.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

OMAH costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $37m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OMAH vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOMAHQDTY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.5%+10.1%
Price change, 1 yearfell 2.4%fell 21.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment75% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.98%1.17%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$1.1bn$37m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OMAH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score53OMAH27.8QDTY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OMAH QDTY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OMAH
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%
Apple Inc 10.43%
American Express Co 6.64%
Kroger Co 5.21%
Coca-Cola Co 5.08%
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%
VeriSign Inc 4.86%
Moody's Corp 4.72%
Only in QDTY
NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 95.10%
XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 0.73%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 0.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
Issuer VistaShares YieldMax
Strategy covered call 0DTE covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 15.0% 30.9%
Expense ratio 0.98% 1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year 14.7% 30.7%
Price change, 1 year −2.4% −21.9%
Total return, 1 year +13.5% +10.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −1.3 pts −2.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 75%
Age 1.7 years 1.7 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $1.1bn $37m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OMAH vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowOMAHQDTYOMAHQDTYOMAHQDTY
3 months+2.5%−2.6%3.7%7.4%+2.6 pts+0.8 pts
6 months+6.2%+0.6%7.4%15.2%+1.2 pts+1.0 pts
1 year+13.5%+10.1%14.7%30.7%−1.3 pts−2.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: OMAH Mar 2025 · QDTY Feb 2025+19.2%+21.7%23.7%45.1%−14.9 pts−8.5 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

OMAH and QDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QDTY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTY paid 30.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 75% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or QDTY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.7%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or QDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +13.5% and QDTY +10.1% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or QDTY?
OMAH charges 0.98% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
OMAH vs ACQQOMAH vs BALQOMAH vs QRMIOMAH vs QDTEQDTY vs BALIQDTY vs FTHIQDTY vs XYLDQDTY vs DIVO
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →OMAH on its own →QDTY on its own →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →QDTY dividend history →QDTY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
VistaShares page for OMAH ↗
QDTY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
QDTY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
QDTY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
YieldMax page for QDTY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OMAH against QDTY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.