Data as of .
OMAH vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OMAH | Only in QDTY |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 10.59% | NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | QDTY | OMAH | QDTY | OMAH | QDTY | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | −0.9% | 3.7% | 7.9% | −2.4 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +20.7% | 7.7% | 17.3% | +2.8 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +20.2% | 14.4% | 30.9% | +4.9 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +27.1% | 21.4% | 42.0% | +12.4 pts | −8.5 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | QDTY YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 25.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 1.17% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 30.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −14.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +20.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 94% |
| Age | 562 days | 582 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $27m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
QDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or QDTY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.9%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or QDTY?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and QDTY returned +20.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or QDTY?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.