Data as of .
OMAH vs ROCQ: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and ROCQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and ROCQ hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 7.12% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 6.30% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 0.75% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in ROCQ |
|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.37% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | Micron Technology, Inc. 6.70% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | Microsoft Corp. 5.03% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.74% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.52% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Lam Research Corp. 4.21% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Intel Corp. 3.58% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.54% | Walmart, Inc. 3.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | ROCQ | OMAH | ROCQ | OMAH | ROCQ | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 3.0% | −2.4 pts | +2.5 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +20.0% | 7.7% | 5.9% | +2.8 pts | −4.2 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +18.0% | 21.4% | 5.8% | +12.4 pts | −4.0 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 10.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 5.8% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +12.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +18.0% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +21.9% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −4.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $629m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
ROCQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against ROCQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-rocq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.